No one can doubt the importance of sound, clear understanding of civil
government: of the authority that civil government has over him, and
of the duty he has toward civil government. Not only does Scripture
make the Christian's relationship to the state part of his or her thankful,
holy life (Romans
13:1-7; I
Peter 2:11-17), but also the broad sphere of the state's power assures
that each of us comes into direct contact with civil government, or
is affected by civil government daily. The teenager who wants to drive
must receive a license from the state, and thereafter submit to the
state every time he gets on the highway. The preacher officiates at
the wedding of a couple only if the state has authorized the marriage,
and says so in the ceremony. The government of the United States requires
parents to educate their children to a certain age, and stipulates the
manner in which this is to be done. Farmers and businessmen have to
contend with many laws regulating their operations. The working man
is painfully aware of the state every time he notices the large chunk
of his wages withheld for taxes. There are also the effects of civil
government upon our lives that we usually take for granted (but should
not!): the protection by the police; the security from invasion because
of the armed forces and the general order in our country because of
government at all levels.
It is especially urgent that Reformed Christians be clear and sound
in their thinking about civil government today, because of powerful
movements that tempt them to adopt erroneous notions and unlawful practices
in this area of their lives. Revolution is now a Christian option! Indeed
(we are told), revolution is the Christian calling! In the 60s the liberal
churches joined in the civil disobedience by which the blacks forced
the state to give them their civil rights. At present, liberal theology
approves violent revolution as the means of liberating the oppressed
in Latin America and South Africa, if not as the primary means, then
as a last resort. Of late, conservative and evangelical Christians,
including some of the most prominently named, not only approve civil
disobedience (i.e., deliberate, strategic violation of certain laws
of the land and flaunting disregard for the authority of the state responsible
for these laws) in order to compel the state to change by force laws
regarded as unjust, but they also proclaim this lawless behavior as
obedience to the gospel and call gospel-believing Christians to participate
in it as an expression of discipleship to Christ. Liberals and conservatives,
modernists and evangelicals are all playing the same game, the one to
deliver the downtrodden from a life of poverty and misery, the other
to save the unborn from the murder of abortion. "For God's sake, rebel!"
It cannot have escaped the attention of the members of our Protestant
Reformed Churches that at least three cases of appeal involving the
relationship of the Reformed believer and the civil government have
come to the broader assemblies in the past few years. This reminds us,
if we need reminding, that the matter of the Reformed Faith's teaching
about the state is of practical importance for the life of our own churches.
In 1986 Classis West upheld a consistory's discipline of a member, who
refused to comply with the income-tax laws of the land, thus condemning
as revolutionary the tax-protest movement. Synod 1987 decided on a case
of the remarriage of a divorced person. One important element of the
decision was Synod's recognition of the state's regulation of the civil
and societal aspect of marriage, so that "the sinfulness of the marriage
of a divorced person does not make null and void this civil aspect of
the marriage, and thus all reality of the marriage, contracted under
the God-given authority of the State" ("Acts of Synod," Art. 14). Last
year, an appellant asked Synod to overturn a decision of Classis East
that required him to submit to the ruling of a civil court granting
visitation rights to the children of his divorced wife. Synod upheld
Classis' decision on the ground, in part, that "the right of a biological
mother to have visitation rights with her children is recognized and
protected by the State (Romans
13)..." ("Acts of Synod," 1988, Art. 29). In all three of these
cases, the assemblies honored the authority of the state and called
on our members to submit to this authority.
As Reformed churches, we confess that civil government has been ordained
by God. Whatever particular government exists in a country has been
ordained by God. Government is not "of the people", government is of
God: "There is no power but of God: the powers that be are ordained
of God (Romans
13:1)". The officials of a government, from the chief executive
to the bureaucrat who shuffles papers, have received authority to govern
you and me "from above" (John
19:11).
The state, with its myriad officers, is the servant of God. Three times
in the classic passage in the New Testament on the Christian's responsibility
to the state (Romans
13:1-7), does the apostle call the state and its officers "ministers,"
or servants, of God. This is an honorable title indeed! Government is
not only or even primarily the servant of the people. As the servant
of God, government must serve God. What a difference it would make,
if our government would see itself as a servant, not primarily of the
people, but of God. In this case, great issues would not be decided
on the basis of public opinion polls, but on the basis of the will of
God. Even though slightly over half of the population might favor abortion
on demand, the Supreme Court would rule that abortion is murder, punishable
by death, on the ground that this is the will of God, plainly revealed
both in the law of nature and in the Bible.
Regardless of the state's ignorance of its servant-hood, it does in
fact serve God. The service it renders is the keeping of some outward
order in society by the punishment of criminals and the protection of
those who do well (I
Peter 2:14). The state's task is the administration of external,
earthly justice in a nation, and every state carries this task out,
however imperfectly, even the most corrupt of them.
This is no small benefit to the church and to the Christian. Outward
order in a land is a precious gift of God to us. Take away the magistrates
and, as Calvin said, "we all must live like rats in the straw." The
worst government is much to be preferred to anarchy.
God's purpose with civil government is that, by the outward restraint
of the dissoluteness of men, the church can exist and carry out her
task of preaching the spiritual, inner righteousness of the gospel,
thus extending the Kingdom of God. Likewise, the people of God can live
quiet and peaceable lives in all godliness and honesty, i.e., Kingdom-lives
(I
Timothy 2:2).
God has two great servants in the world-the church, which serves Him
freely by grace, and the state, which serves Him for the most part (there
are a few Christians in government, here and there) by dint of God's
sovereign might of providence, even as Cyrus in the Old Testament. (Cyrus
ordered the rebuilding of the temple by the Jews.)
Reformed Christians ought to honor God's servant, the state. They may
not view it as devilish. They should not dismiss government as "dirty
politics." No God-fearing young person may ever call the policeman,
"pig."
We may use the state in the functions God intends it to serve. The
Christian may have recourse to the courts in defense of his name and
property. A church may claim the protection of the authorities for the
possession of their property and the peace and order of their meetings,
as Article 28 of the Reformed Church Order states. A position in government
is a perfectly proper profession for a Reformed Christian. Young men
must register for the draft, and serve in the armed forces when called
up.
Never may the child of God revolt or "resist," as the King James Version
puts it in Romans
13:1ff. The prohibition against revolution is absolute and unconditional.
This is historic Calvinism. The notion, popular today, that Calvinism
is a revolutionary theology is mistaken. Both Luther and Calvin unconditionally
forbade revolution by the Christian. For both, the only permissible
way to bring a tyrant down was the legal resistance by the "lesser magistrates."
One of the main purposes for the writing of the Belgic Confession was
to dissociate the Reformed church from the seditious anabaptists. Writ
large in our Confession is the claim, "We Reformed are not revolutionaries."
The Heidelberg Catechism makes rejection of all revolutionary conduct
(including rebellion of the heart!) a creedal stand, when it binds upon
every Reformed person that he submit to "all in authority over me...
and also patiently bear with their weaknesses..." (Lord's Day, 39).
The importance of this is two-fold:
- Thus, we escape the wrathful judgment of God, indeed the damnation
that He visits on all who resist His ordinance, His servant.
- Thus, we distinguish ourselves from the world that is in revolt
against the authority of God, pleasing our Sovereign by a holy life.
Perhaps by this time alone among Reformed and Presbyterian churches,
the Protestant Reformed Churches are, and can be, consistent in their
testimony and behavior of submission to God-ordained authority. For
at the cost of great personal sacrifice by many working men and at the
cost of numerical growth, these churches have resolutely opposed the
revolt against the authority of the employer-the violent revolt against
the authority of the employer-in the sphere of labor that is inherent
in the labor union. Our stand against rebellion has not been cheap.
Unconditional submission is not the same as unconditional obedience.
The state is not God. The God and Father of Jesus Christ is God. Only
He commands our unconditional obedience. The state is to be obeyed except
when its law demands disobedience to the will of God in Holy Scripture.
Exactly because Reformed Christians obey for God's sake, or for "conscience
sake," as Romans
13:5 puts it, they adopt a watchful, critical stance with regard
to civil government. Caesar shall not have the things that are God's.
There are ominous signs in our country. The state deifies itself, taking
to itself the prerogatives of God, as is evident in the abortion-law-the
state seizes sovereignty over life and death. The state becomes totalitarian,
thrusting itself into every area of life, as is evident generally in
the welfare state and particularly in the state's funding of and control
over the care of little children in the day-care centers. The state
intrudes into the sphere of the church, attacking what the Scottish
Presbyterians called the "crown rights of King Jesus." A court recently
fined a church for exercising church discipline upon a member; a current
case has the courts threatening a church's pastoral counseling of its
members, and the fear that the state may penalize churches that refuse
to allow women to hold church-office or to permit practicing homosexuals
to be members is not far-fetched.
Even then the church may not revolt. But neither will it obey. In the
name of Christ, she says to the insubordinate servant of God, "We ought
to obey God rather than men." Then, as has happened again and again
in the history of the church, she suffers for Christ's sake, not resisting.
Still, the state is God's servant. For the blood of martyrs is the
seed of the church.
As for the punishing of the ungodly, unjust, corrupt, and even antichristian
rulers, we let the God of these gods deal with them. He has His ways
of doing so.
- DJE
Back to the top
The Duty of the Church in Respect to the State
in Preaching, Praying and Positions
By Rev. Dale H. Kuiper
From the December 1, 1988, issue of The
Standard Bearer
See
more articles by this author
The church of Jesus Christ, as she honors her Head as the Lord of lords
and King of kings, is very conscious of the fact that she lives and
witnesses in the midst of a world which contains governments of many
different kinds and at many levels. Her attitude towards the magistracy
in her official labors, as well as in the life of her members, is very
definitely set forth in Holy Scripture; it is set forth as binding and
for all time. Since this is part of God's Word, it becomes part of the
preaching; as part of the preaching, it belongs to the Gospel of salvation
in Jesus Christ.
Rather than adopting an attitude of superiority on the part of believers
towards the magistracy, or encouraging ignorance in them regarding the
purpose, source, and function of civil government, or engendering disobedience
against the law of the land, the church in her preaching calls the people
of God to submission and obedience, with understanding and joy. That
the church must do this periodically in the preaching is clear from
the powerful Word of God found in such passages as Matthew
22, Romans
13, I
Peter 2, and Titus
3. Further, this is plainly demonstrated by the examples of David,
Daniel, the apostles, and Jesus Christ Himself.
The Gospel's call to submission unto the civil magistrates is a matter
of thankfulness to God. For this reason those Reformed churches that
still carefully preach the Heidelberg Catechism hear this call under
the third part of the Catechism, "Of Thankfulness," when the fifth commandment
of the Law of God is expounded and when the requirement to "show all
honor, love, and fidelity to my father and mother, and all in authority
over me" is set forth (Lord's Day 39). That thankfulness enters in here,
rather than fear or merit, ought to be seen from two points of view.
First, we testify by this submissive conduct gratitude toward God for
providing Jesus Christ as the perfect Keeper of the law in our place,
as the end of the law for righteousness to every one that believes.
In the knowledge of that, the believer, with the law as his guide, shows
his love to God. But more, he finds in the keeping of the fifth commandment
an opportunity to serve the Lord Jesus Christ, because he understands
that the powers that be are ordained of God, and are ordained of God
to function as the means through which the exalted Christ rules! He
submits always, and obeys unless for conscience sake he cannot, as unto
the Lord.
The Gospel's call to submission carries with it the call to the church
to be witnesses of God. When the apostle Peter exhorts us to "submit
to every ordinance of man for the Lord's sake," he does so under the
heading of "an honest conversation among the Gentiles." When the unconverted
see the good works of the saints, they shall under God's grace "glorify
God in the day of visitation." This truth the Catechism includes in
Lord's Day 32: "...and that, by our godly conversation, others may be
gained to Christ."
Without controversy, the church preaches the Word of God as that Word
of God describes civil government and calls the believer to honor that
government. Thus sermons on the paying of taxes, the honoring of authority,
the lawful work of government, and the end of earthly governments, are
perfectly in order in the church.
What is not so clear is how the church prays in respect to the government
God has instituted in this world in general or in a particular part
of the world specifically. Here there is some controversy. Pastors hear
from members of their flocks, from time to time, that they are not praying
for the government. At a recent office-bearers conference in the West,
the complaint was sounded that our ministers don't pray for government
officials nearly enough. Are these well-meant criticisms justified?
Scripture makes clear that prayers must be made for kings and others
in eminent places by the church. Nowhere is this more clearly stated
than in I
Timothy 2:1-7, part of which reads:
I exhort therefore, that, first of all, supplications, prayers,
intercessions, and giving of thanks, be made for all men; For kings
and for all that are in authority; that we may lead a quiet and peaceable
life in all godliness and honesty. For this is good and acceptable
in the sight of God our Savior, who will have all men to be saved,
and to come unto the knowledge of the truth.
Before we face the questions, "How are earthly rulers to be mentioned
in our prayers?" and, "What is the purpose of these prayers for them?",
let us get two points firmly in mind, The purpose of Paul's first letter
to Timothy is that he and the church may know how to behave in the house
of God (I
Timothy 3:15). Therefore, the apostle is giving instruction regarding
the public prayers of the people of God during the worship services;
we would say, during the congregational prayer offered by the minister.
So, too, the exhortations regarding the dress of women and the silence
of women pertain to their behavior and their silence in the church.
Secondly, the word "all" in this passage (I
Timothy 2:1,4,6) does not mean "every." The word "every" counts
noses, refers to each individual in a group; it is distributive in nature.
The word "all" is collective; it looks at people as groups, without
saying anything about every member within the group. Unless this is
appreciated, the only alternative is the Arminian notion that God wills
every man to be saved and Christ gave Himself a ransom for every individual
in the world; and then we are to pray for every person in the world
(I
Timothy 2:1) without distinction. Indeed, a Reformed commentator
claims, "the church must remember that she is the intercessor for the
world. The world cannot pray. The church is to bring the needs of the
world before the throne of God. Herein too she is the salt of the earth.
The world will not last long if the salt has lost its savor. When the
church is gathered for worship, she is to bring the world's needs to
God's mercy seat." With this we cannot agree. (See Jesus' prayer in
John 17:9.)
Prayer must be made for all men, that is, for all kinds or classes
of men. This is borne out by Titus
2 and Galatians 3
where we read of these various classes of people: Jews and Greeks, bond
and free, male and female, young and old. Paul must have noticed that
in Ephesus a certain class or group of people was being neglected in
the congregational prayers: the kings and princes. How surprised Timothy
and the saints at Ephesus must have been to receive this instruction!
Nero was the Roman emperor; the governors, proconsuls, and town clerks
for the most part were decidedly against the Christian faith and were
ready to do the Jews a favor. But it is wrong to exclude any class of
people from our prayers.
The reason that prayers are made also for government officials is that
God wills to save His elect also from this group, have them come to
the knowledge of the truth, and enjoy the ransom that Christ paid for
them. The church is to pray for the salvation of kings and princes!
This does not require, as a matter of fact, that a certain segment of
the congregational prayers be given over to petitions on behalf of these
officials, at length and by name! But they are to be included as the
church prays for the salvation of the people of God, known unto Him
before the foundations of the world!
There is another aspect to all this. After all, God does not will to
save many from the class of the powerful, rich and mighty (I
Corinthians 1:27-28). But these rulers do have a great influence
upon the life of the church and the labors of the church. If there is
a believing ruler over a certain domain, it certainly is easier for
the believers there to live a "quiet and peaceable life in all godliness
and honesty." We think of laws concerning the Sabbath, concerning the
right to work, and the right to assemble. On the contrary, unbelieving
magistrates, ruling according to opinion polls, taking bribes, lusting
for power, can cause hardship for the church-perhaps no right of assembly,
sermons to be approved by the secretary of religion, no religious programs
on radio or television, no mission work allowed in the country! And
since God wills to gather His church from all classes of people and
from every nation of the world, prayers are to be made that Christ may
so rule that the work of the preaching of the Gospel be not hindered.
Finally, let us who live in lands of religious freedom, such as the
United States and Canada, be sure to express thanksgiving to God for
these liberties that we presently enjoy! How easily we take for granted
these wonderful freedoms, which many people of God do not presently
enjoy and which will be taken from us before Jesus returns.
Briefly we wish to consider yet the duty of the church in respect to
the actions or proposed actions of various governmental bodies-the whole
matter of the church writing position papers on certain issues, which
are then presented to the government with the purpose of influencing
legislation. Many church bodies are engaged in such activity. Synods
and other assemblies of the church formulate positions on nuclear bodies,
abortion, the righteousness of a certain war, pollution of the environment,
admission of Red China to the UN, apartheid in South Africa, and the
like. Here we must make a clear distinction between the activity of
the church as an institute on the one hand, and the individual member
of the church, who is a citizen of a certain country on the other hand.
Elsewhere in this issue the calling of the child of God toward his government
and the issues that face his government will be discussed. Here we are
concerned only with the proper involvement of the church in these things.
How ought the church to behave?
We find nothing in Scripture to suggest, much less demand, that the
church concern herself with matters of civil legislation. The church
by her very marks is busy with the preaching of the Gospel, the administration
of the sacraments, and the application of Christian discipline to unrepentant
sinners within her membership. The church is not called by God or directed
by Scripture to discipline the world. The church is not the salt of
the earth in the sense of getting out into that world to preserve it;
Scripture never speaks of salt as a preservative. Salt is that which
renders something savory or tasty! And the presence of the faithful
church on the earth makes the entire earth tasty unto God! Let the church
be busy in preaching all the truth, and applying that truth to the problems
and trials that believers face in this world. Thus armed, the child
of God can go forth to battle as a saint who is a citizen of some earthly
kingdom for a time. Thus informed, he votes according to the dictates
of his conscience, signs petitions as he sees fit, trains his children
to honor the king.
That this is the Reformed view of the duty of the church regarding
the things of the state is clear from Article 30 of our Church Order
where we find that in Consistory, Classis, and Synod "ecclesiastical
matters only shall be transacted." This maintains the separation of
church and state. This helps to insure that the church does not mistake
her mission in this world, and this shows that the church becomes involved
only when one of her membership breaks a civil law, or when the state
so intrudes into the sphere of the church, that under oppression the
church addresses the State for relief and points it to her God-given
duty.