|
|
The Reformation was many things. It was a return to the supreme authority
of the Scriptures. It was a restoration of preaching to its place of primacy.
It was a revival of true, heartfelt worship. It was a "re-formation" of the
church institute, a re-emphasis of the doctrines of sovereign grace, and more
besides.
But one of its greatest contributions was its restoration and revival
of the blessedness of family life. Here we come to the full harvest of what
the Spirit worked in the Reformation.
God's chief purpose in the Reformation was not to revive preaching for its own
sake, so we could have great works of preaching to admire and discuss. The great
purpose of the Reformation was to restore preaching that would restore Godliness,
Godliness in the lives of believers, and to produce Christian homes.
Permit me the use of an extended metaphor. The church of Christ at the dawn
of the Reformation was like a great oak tree standing dormant under the cold,
dark, European wintry-blast of the Middle Ages. Then came the springtime of
the Reformation. And from the roots of the Scriptures the Spirit began to send
His life into the church, stirring its sluggish sap and sending His vitality
-- first into the trunk of the preaching, then on into the branches of the sanctuaries
and congregations, and at last producing the blessed foliage and fruit of the
God-fearing family and home.
And when you think of it, in many ways this is the very goal and purpose of
God's saving word altogether, namely, the salvation of believers and their seed
who live together and confess and praise the same Jehovah God. This follows
from the fact that God is a covenant God.
It is these families that would come and fill the sanctuaries of the church,
worshiping God as His great congregation.
One is reminded here of the very last promise found in the very last verse of
the very last prophet of the Old Testament, Malachi, as he speaks of what would
characterize Messiah's great kingdom and church. "And he (i.e., the second Elijah)
shall turn the heart of the fathers to the children, and the heart of the children
to their fathers, lest I come and smite the earth with a curse" (Mal.
4:6).
What a striking promise with which to end the Old Testament! A covenant promise,
a promise that speaks of the revival of family ties. It speaks of fathers with
children, no longer estranged, but worshiping one and the same God through the
Mediator sent.
And this is what the Spirit accomplished in the tree of the church by means
of the Reformation -- the flourishing again of Godly and pious family life;
family life that is itself centered in God's Word and worship; family life in
which the father (not to exclude the mother, but we speak of the ideal), as
head of the home, understands his spiritual calling, and leads in prayer and
instruction and praise.
This was no small gift to the church through the Reformation.
That the Reformers should be used by God to reintroduce family worship into
the lives of believers is a striking thing. It is striking because, if there
was one thing that seems to have been absent from the lives of the early Reformers,
it was their being raised in what we would call God-fearing homes, homes in
which the Word of God ruled, homes where there was family worship. I am speaking
of men of such stature as Wycliffe, Huss, Luther, Calvin, Tyndale, Knox, Zwingli,
and others besides.
The Reformers were voluminous in their writings. Yet one looks in vain for references
to themselves as being the products of spiritual, God-centered homes. Such references
are conspicuous by their absence.
In a couple of instances you do have favorable mention of the piety of their
mothers, namely, of Luther's and Calvin's. They had mothers to whose religious
sincerity one is attracted, though even the piety of these mothers was mixed
with great ignorance and superstition.
Calvin, for instance, had an early memory of his mother walking with him for
two hours to enter a cathedral (when he was three years old) and then lifting
him us to kiss the supposed skull of St. Anne, Mary's mother. It indicated devout
zeal, but not according to knowledge. As for Luther's and Calvin's fathers,
they were members of Rome's church. Luther had a great deal of respect, one
might say dread, for his father, and he did recall seeing his father praying.
But the general impression of the fathers of the Reformers is that their church
membership was a matter of economic wisdom more than anything else. It was a
matter of livelihood.
The Reformers were raised in the typical Roman Catholic homes of the time.
We should pause here for the praise of women!
It is a striking thing that even in the most spiritually barren times of the
history of the church, when not a man can be found in Israel, still women, mothers,
were quietly, patiently laboring to preserve some piety in the home. Women,
mothers, seem always to be the one great constant in church history. So often
they are found laboring with little help, and with no leadership or encouragement
from their husbands.
The spiritual home-fires burned at low ebb. That they burned at all was due
to the mothers, not the fathers.
The absence of being raised in the sound, God-fearing homes was apparently characteristic
of the lives of the Reformers. And yet from such homes came the men that God
used to restore spiritually to the home, and family worship itself.
The homes of the early Protestants were markedly different from the homes of
their Roman Catholic neighbors.
The primary reason?
Protestant homes had fathers who began to function as head of their homes --
not only in financial matters (what trades their sons were to pursue) but also
in spiritual. They began to function as spiritual heads of their homes. They
took it upon themselves to provide leadership in the spiritual development of
their children. They became New Testament Joshuas -- "As for me and my house..."
The Reformation served to revive the hearts of the fathers for their children.
Men became spiritual leaders in their homes. Such involvement paid rich dividends
in the spiritual climate of the home and for the church herself.
All this raises a deeper question, namely, what was it that prompted these "sons
of the Reformation" to take this sudden interest in the spiritual quality of
their families and to provide the leadership?
One could say, the Holy Spirit. That is true enough.
But what truth and doctrine did the Spirit use to prompt men to see what their
task and calling and qualifications were?
Here we run into the rediscovery of the truth of the priesthood of all believers.
This is what had been stolen from God's people along with God's Word. And that
robbery left the members of the church destitute, spiritually lethargic, and
chained in their own ignorance, convinced it could never be otherwise.
All knowledge, all understanding of God's Word and ways had to be left to the
professional priesthood of the church. They alone had the spirit of understanding
and interpretation. No one could approach into the presence of God without a
priest acting as his mediator, or giving him temporary permission to do so.
The Reformation changed all that.
There is but one Mediator, the Lord Jesus Christ. All believers have His good
and Holy Spirit. He is the Spirit of knowledge and understanding to all, young
and old. And, having the Spirit and anointing of Christ, one has the right of
direct access to the Father and the throne of grace.
This meant that the Protestant husband did not simply turn his family over to
the church and her priests. Rather, he understood his own office and task as
spiritual head of the home. He took it upon himself to lead his family in the
ways of God and into His presence.
The fruit of the Reformation was found in its widespread effect on home-life
across the map of Europe.
James W. Alexander, in his book entitled Thoughts on Family Worship,
wrote of a wide prevalence of household piety found across the map of Reformation
Europe. He states that "...in no country did the light of the dwelling burn
more brightly than in Scotland... Probably no land, in proportion to its inhabitants,
ever had so many praying families..." (p. 22).
Having stated that "in Scotland especially the humblest persons, in the remotest
cottages, honoured God by daily praise...": (p. 25), Alexander goes on to quote
a Mr. Hamilton.
I have sometimes seen family-worship in great houses, but I have felt that
God was quite as near when I knelt with a praying family on the earthen floor
of their cottage. I have known of family-worship among the reapers in a barn.
It used to be common in the fishing-boats upon the firths and lakes of Scotland.
I have heard of this being observed in the depths of a coal-pit.
There is historical evidence to substantiate this description of the land of
John Knox.
This family worship is the legacy of Calvin, who taught, "Every family of the
pious ought to be a Church" (Commentaries, Genesis, I, p. 455).
Luther, who married and had children and a lively household, took the time to
draw up a "Small Catechism" with the specific intent that it be taught to children.
At the heading of its first part are words written large, as the head of
the family should teach them in a simple way to his household. In this
section he includes such basic items as the Ten Commandments, the Lord's Prayer,
and the Apostles' Creed, with simple explanations of each point.
Luther also included a section entitled, "How the Head of the Family Should
Teach His Household to Pray Morning and Evening." Here he composed what he calls
some "little prayers" for children to recite for various occasions, to be taught
by parents.
The very Heidelberg Catechism with which we are so familiar was written with
the instruction of the youth in mind. This instruction was to be promoted in
each and every home.
We see then that the Reformers were conscious of the need for parents (and for
fathers in particular) to serve as "teaching-priests." They gave not only exhortation
here, but also direction and assistance. The fruit of their promptings could
be seen in the vigorous growth of Godly homes. They were homes not only of doctrinal
knowledge, but of personal piety and family worship. Around mealtime and bedtime
large sections of Europe took on a different face. Praises to God could be heard
as you walked down the village lanes.
Nowhere has this matter of family worship been so thoroughly addressed as by
the Westminster Assembly. They made specific reference to this calling in their
Confession (Ch. 21, Art. 6).
God is to be worshipped everywhere, in spirit and in truth; as in private
families daily, and in secret each one by himself.
Already prior to this in Scotland, by the Act of Assembly 1596, the elders,
"within the quarter and bounds assigned to each of them," were instructed to
inquire about the matter of family worship. At church visitation the question
was put to the elders, "Are they careful to have the worship of God set up in
the families of their bounds?" The ministers in his pastoral rounds was to ask
"Whether God be worshipped in the family, by prayers, praises, and reading of
the Scriptures? ... If there be catechizing in the family?"
In the same year that the Westminster Confession was adopted (1647) the General
Assembly of the Church of Scotland drew up a "Directory for Family-Worship."
This "Directory" lays out in detailed form what the Presbyterian "church-fathers"
were convinced made up proper, profitable family worship. It represents the
best of the Reformation on family-worship.
How serious the Assembly took this matter of regular family worship is apparent
from the prologue to this "Directory." Having required that the minister and
ruling elders make "diligent search" whether there were families under their
care neglecting this matter of family worship, the Assembly went on to say,
...and if any such family be found, the head of the family is to be first
admonished privately to amend his fault; and, in case of his continuing therein,
he is to be gravely and sadly reproved by the session; after which reproof,
if he be found still to neglect Family-worship, let him be, for his obstinacy
in such an offence, suspended and debarred from the Lord's Supper ... till
he amend.
This reminds us that regular family worship is not only a privilege, but a calling
and a duty. God Himself will call us to account.
Since most are unfamiliar with this "Directory", it is worth our while to quote
a few select segments.
Having stated that "Besides the public worship in congregations... private worship
of families, be pressed and set up," the "Directory" goes on to speak of "The
ordinary duties comprehended under the exercise of piety which should be in
families..."
First, prayer, and praises performed, with a special reference, as well to
the condition of the Kirk [Church] of God, and this kingdom, as to the present
state of the family, and every member thereof. Next, reading of the Scriptures,
with catechizing in a plain way, that the understandings of the simpler may
be better enabled to profit under the public ordinances, and they made more
capable to understand the Scriptures when they are read: together with godly
conferences tending to the edification of all the members in the most holy
faith: as also, admonition and rebuke, upon just reasons, from those who have
authority in the family.
Article IV begins with the practical reminder, "The head of the family is to
take care that none of the family withdraw himself from any part of family-worship..."
Having given some good practical instruction on the calling of a father to make
sure that his family had profited from congregational worship on the Lord's
Day, the Assembly addressed the matter of family prayer (Art. IX):
So many as can conceive prayer, ought to make use of that gift of god; albeit
those who are rude and weaker may begin at a set form of prayer, but so as
they be not sluggish in stirring up in themselves (according to their daily
necessities) the spirit of prayer, which is given to all the children of God
in some measure..."
To give some direction in the matter of prayer, a list of elements suitable
for prayer was then set down. For instance:
Let them confess to God how unworthy they are to come in his presence, and
how unfit to worship His Majesty...
They are to confess their sins, and the sins of the family...
They are to give thanks to God for his many mercies to his people, and to
themselves...
They ought to pray for the kirk [church] of Christ in general, for all the
reformed kirks, and for this kirk in particular ... for all our superiors,
the king's majesty... for the magistrates, ministers, and the whole body of
the congregation whereof they are members...
The far-reaching influence of diligent attendance to this matter of family worship,
which we call "family devotions", simply cannot be emphasized enough. It is
at the time of family worship and devotions that our children are given to see
a spiritual side of us they might not otherwise know about. They get to see
our heart of hearts, and perceive our deepest spiritual concerns (whether spiritual
concerns are even there). This can have a powerful impact on them.
J.W. Alexander put it well:
The children look more deeply into the parents' heart by the medium of family-prayer.
A single burst of genuine fatherly anxiety in the midst of ardent intercession
may speak to a child a volume of long-hidden and travailing grief and love.
Such words, uttered on the knees, though from the plain untutored man, are
sometimes as arrows in the heart of unconverted youth. The child is forced
to say within himself, "How can I offend against the father who daily wrestles
with God in my behalf? How can I be careless about the soul, for which he
is thus concerned?" ... He is little read in the human heart who fails to
recognize here a great element of filial piety, or who refuses to believe
that the tenderness of a child's attachment is increased by the stated worship
of the household (Directory, pp. 63-64).
God-fearing parents ought to read these words again, and then reflect on their
own prayers uttered at the table with their children. How heartfelt and personal
are our family prayers? The fruit of attendance to this kind of family worship
was the marked godliness and happiness in the land of Scotland for many long
years.
Scotland was not alone in this practice. Its parallel could be found in the
Protestant home life of the northern provinces of Holland as well. The documents
produced by the Synod of Dordt show that same concern for family life, namely,
one that revolved around the Word of God and prayer, and involved daily worship.
One element we tend to forget (neglect?), but which was promoted by the Reformers,
was family singing, families singing psalms and good hymns at mealtime. Luther
composed songs for his own children. "Away in a Manger" is one familiar instance.
There were others of more substance. His own family often took out their musical
instruments and made melody on their strings and in their hearts, praising God
by song. It is simply a fact that Reformation homes were psalm-singing homes.
Family singing, as part of family worship, was once common practice in Reformed
homes. The evidence of this is seen in how many of our Dutch (and German) grandparents
knew their old psalms in versification. Psalm after psalm, stanza after stanza,
by memory. They had learned them by singing them as children in their families
in the "old country". This had great benefit later in life, even on their deathbeds.
They could sing psalms of comfort and of victory. The Word of God was embedded
in their souls in song!
Since that day things have slipped in this area. Evidently it started soon after
our grandparents moved to this country. Singing as a common element of family
worship died out even in our grandparents homes.
Why? I suspect, in part, that they, like ourselves, became too busy in this
land of commercial opportunity. They did not have enough time anymore to do
all these things as they sat down with their families. And undoubtedly the language
problem entered in as well. Dutch was their mother- tongue, but their children
were more familiar with English. Who was interested in learning Dutch songs
anymore? For whatever reason, the custom of singing as part of family devotions
all but died out.
This raises the question of course, how much singing do we do together as families
anymore, or even as believers getting together? True, we can be thankful for
Christian schools which are still teaching our children "psalms and spiritual
songs." These are the melodies they will later sing in their hearts. But what
about our own families and singing?
Permit me to give a couple of suggestions.
First, most of us have "sound systems" in our "family rooms", some rather elaborate
ones at that. What an excellent opportunity to fill the atmosphere of our homes
with good, solid, spiritual, God-glorifying, grace-magnifying, biblically-sound,
music and praise.
And let us not forget the Psalms! Please! They tie us in with the church of
all ages; and this will help singing in church. The songs our children hear
regularly in the home are the songs they will most enjoy singing years down
the line. And who knows in what "dungeons dark and deep" they will need these
songs!
Secondly, what about the holidays, when our extended families, young and old,
get together? What a splendid opportunity to sing together as families. Spiritual
songs for the season and anthems of praise. Take along the song books. Make
it a family tradition. Let us remember, it is exactly where family worship has
flourished that you find a flourishing church, its worship services well attended
by entire families, morning and evening. And it is from these families that
come faithful kingdom workers -- mothers, fathers, office-bearers, teachers,
Godly witnesses, and all the rest.
Where has it been neglected?
J.W. Alexander again is much to the point:
I no longer marvel that Christianity has become a dying, empty, thing in the
houses of those professors (alas, that there should be such!) where there
is no joint worship of God (p. 54)
This is a timely reminder to us.
We are reminded that the Reformers called husbands and fathers to take the lead
in this. It was not enough simply that they read and prayed each day briefly
with their families. Rather, time was to be taken to instruct and discuss.
Did children understand what was read?
How did the Word apply to the life and members of the home?
The father was to bring it home!
And what were the particular needs of each that needed to be addressed in admonition
or in explicit reference in prayer? In summation, time was to be taken (made,
if you will) just as with church worship. Thought was to be given. And God's
Word was to be thoughtfully applied.
And then the family, led by the father-priest, was to approach God in prayer
once again. Sins were confessed. Grace sought. Needs laid out. Love expressed.
And homage and gratitude rendered.
This is the legacy for the Reformation to our families.
Now follow the questions.
Are we taking the time for family worship?
Are we giving it thought?
Are we doing our best to have devotions with all the family members present?
Or, have we let these things slip?
The sad truth is, the springtime of the Reformation is long past. Deep autumn
is upon us as the church of Christ and families. Are we also growing lax and
becoming dormant -- leaves yellow, fruit withering, devotional life sluggish
in our homes?
Fathers, does it not start with ourselves as head of homes?
When the Lord of Elijah returns, will He find faith and fruit yet in our generations?
May I remind you that spiritual vitality and strength to resist the most severe
spiritual frost and stormy blast has to do with faithfulness in "family worship"?
God give us the grace to attend to it!
| Back
to top | Back to main
Reformed Witness page |
The Reformed Witness newsletter is published
monthly under the auspices of the Evangelism Committee of the Hope Protestant
Reformed Church of Redlands. This newsletter is available to anyone who
is interested in the Reformed Faith. If you would like your name added
to our mailing list, please write to:
The Reformed Witness
Hope Protestant Reformed Church
1307 E. Brockton Ave.
Redlands, CA 92374-3802
or email us:
|